If a bare majority of Justices can invent a new right and impose that right on the rest of the country, the only real limit on what future majorities will be able to do is their own sense of what those with political power and cultural influence are willing to tolerate- Justice Alito
The Supreme Court Justice Thomas in his dissenting argument for the case OBERGEFELL v. HODGES, in which, in a vote of 5-4 voted legalizing same sex marriage, gives a compelling argument of why he dissented. He say's “Aside from undermining the political processes
that protect our liberty, the majority’s decision threatens the religious
liberty our Nation has long sought to protect. The history of religious liberty
in our country is familiar: Many of the earliest immigrants to America came
seeking freedom to practice their religion without restraint” He goes on to say, “Today’s decision might change the former, but it
cannot change the latter. It appears all but inevitable that the two will come
into conflict, particularly as individuals and churches are confronted with
demands to participate in and endorse civil marriages between same-sex couples.” Marriage is a religious
matter for many people. Many have strong
religious beliefs that marriage is to be between a man and a woman. This ruling may take away the right to
practice this religious view. Churches may
be forced to allow same sex marriage or be penalized for it. We cannot allow our religious liberties to be
taken away from us. After this ruling it is only a matter of time before some same
sex couples insist on being allowed to be married anywhere. whether it goes
against another’s religious belief or not.
We must fight this and be allowed to practice our 1st amendment
rights and have religious freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment